December 2005 Archives

Abesofmaine.com update

|

Well, I guess my little temper tantrum had some effect:

> Dear Customer
>
> I am really sorry for the experienence you had , please not his is not the
> norm. I will look into the situation further and find out who you spoke
> to.
> I do have one unit available if you still want the order I will give you a
> $15.00 discount and ship overnight so you can get on Tuesday or Wednesday
> I have cancelled you order for now. If you still want the order with the
> discount. Please email me back to reinstate the order
>
> Thank You
> Nancy L.
> Abe's of Maine

Unfortunately, while Nancy may personally be blameless (and considering what a bitchy message I wrote, she was awfully kind in response!) the number of bad recent reviews on this site tells a different tale...

Abesofmaine SUCKS

|

To:info@abesofmaine.com

To whom it obviously doesn't concern in the slightest,

I placed an order for a Kenwood KCA-IP500 iPod Interface/Controller on November 11. It was supposed to be a birthday present for one of my best friends. Nearly two weeks later, I get an email from "Nancy" telling me it's being reordered and do I mind waiting 10-14 more days. No problem, I say.

It's now the last day of 2005 and there's no further word and no product. I emailed your company two days ago, and despite the claims that you respond to email "promptly", I get nothing. Guess what? "Promptly" doesn't mean "ignore emails from your customers." Not after you've made them wait for their order for 6 weeks.

I just tried calling, too. TWICE. The first time, I was on hold for 20 minutes. I finally got through to a live human being, and then when she put me on hold to look something up, I got disconnected. I called back, waited another 20 minutes -- and got hung up on AGAIN. My only consolation is that it was to your 800 number and you got billed for it.

What is a customer supposed to do if 1) you don't fulfill your orders 2) you don't respond to polite emails and 3) you hang up on your customers? You expect to stay in business? Not after everyone hears about the poor service you provide.

So I'm through. I don't know whether you guys are thieving crooks, or just incompetents who can't even tie your shoes let alone run an e-commerce business, but I don't really care at this point. Cancel my order. If you try to charge my card, I will sic Visa and my lawyer relatives all over your sorry company.

p.s.

Happy new year.

Brokeback Mountain

|

Saw Brokeback Mountain (which I haven't been able to stop referring to as "Bareback Mountain")

Unfortunate subject line of an email...

|

Somehow in the course of buying baby shower gifts, I got on the mailing list of a company called Due Maternity.

Today, I received an email from them about their end-of-year sale.

Subject: "2005 Maternity Blowout!"

Yes, folks, the clearance sale that comes with a free epidural...

Rent to your cousin, go to jail?

|

I've heard no end of rediculous things this year, but this, well...

The inspector slid into his Crown Victoria, a police radio on his belt, addresses in hand. It was after 5 p.m., and he and his interpreter rolled into Manassas, down a street of benign ranch houses strung with lights. They parked, walked to a door and knocked.

"Mrs. Chavez?" Victor Purchase asked in the quiet evening.

There had been a complaint, he said. The city needed to know not just how many people lived there but how they were related. He handed Leyla Chavez a form and explained that she could be prosecuted for lying.

"Okay," she said and, in a mild state of shock, began filling it out.

There was Chavez and her husband. Their two sons. A nephew. The man who rented downstairs. His girlfriend.

"Your nephew, under our law, is considered unrelated," Purchase said, then delivered the verdict: Two people had to go.

That is because a zoning ordinance adopted this month by the city of Manassas redefines family, essentially restricting households to immediate relatives, even when the total is below the occupancy limit.

The rule, which has alarmed civil libertarians and housing activists, is among a series of attempts by municipalities across the nation to use zoning powers to deal with problems they associate with immigrants, often illegal, who have settled in suburbs, typically in shared housing to help with the rent or mortgage.

"It is not only unfair; it's racism," said Edgar Rivera, an organizer with Tenants and Workers United, a Northern Virginia group that advocates affordable housing as a solution to overcrowding. "It's basically a way to just go after certain communities."

The family in the example above? Homeowners who are now going to be priced out of the market. In a time of sagging home sales, shouldn't that concern people, if nothing else about this story does?

"It isn't just too many people in the house," said Manassas Vice Mayor Harry J. "Hal" Parrish II. "It's impacting parking on the streets. It's impacting the hospital and its costs, our emergency services, our schools to a great extent."

Parrish said he understands why some people might think the ordinance is racist, but he disagrees. "In my heart, I believe that is not the issue," he said. "The issue is the impact of overcrowding in our community. It looks as though that issue is a direct result of illegal immigration."

But Chavez and her husband, Juan, are U.S. citizens. They came from Honduras in the 1980s, worked more than one job -- she at two laundromats, he as a cook -- and eventually saved enough to buy the house on Liberia Avenue in 2003 for $270,000.

Now, faced with the loss of rental income and with a $3,500 monthly mortgage to pay, Chavez said, they are going to sell. The family will never buy a house again, she said.

Chavez, who has two nephews in the military who served in Iraq, said she could understand having some kind of rule against overcrowding.

"When it's 20 or 30 people, when there are drinkers, drugs, I say yes," she said.

Considering, though, that every house on her block more or less resembles hers, and considering that she has only seven people living in a five-bedroom house, she was suspicious about why she was singled out. As far as she knew, she and her husband were just doing what any normal family would do to make it.

"Americans live that way, too," Chavez said. "They have roommates."

Damn right. I had my cousin living with me part-time for 1 1/2 years. Under this ordinance, she would have had to find someplace else to stay. Of course we're both white so the city would have turned a blind eye.

Hopefully the small-c conservatives will notice things are going too far. But probably not.

Counting down...

|

Bush Countdown ClockThis is the Bush Countdown Clock. I was in Bookshop Santa Cruz last week, and they had a bin of these by the cash registers. I bought one for a friend, who has been proudly sporting it on her keychain ever since. She did experience one tense encounter in a shop in Berkeley, where another customer spat, "How can you stand to look at him!" My friend suggested she take a closer look, and all was forgiven.

They seem to have been a runaway hit — and in fact seem to have sold out already. Looks like they'll be making more, so place your order today!

Well, that's a load off MY mind...

|

Missing lab explosives turn up safe and sound.

Numerous firearms and a chop-shop for stolen vehicles were discovered in the recovery of hundreds of pounds of stolen explosives, federal officials said Saturday.

Four men were arrested Friday in connection with the looted explosives that disappeared from Cherry Engineering's storage depot eight miles southwest of Albuquerque earlier in the week, a spokesman for the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said.

Authorities didn't say what the thieves planned to do with the explosives, which was enough to flatten a large building, but they believed the theft was not related to terrorism.

Right, because only dark-skinned people commit terrorism. Hell, I'm surprised they even said these guys "looted" the explosives.

BARRON'S gets a clue!??!!?

|

Conservative, Wall Street Journal property Barrons' drops the i-word.

AS THE YEAR WAS DRAWING TO A CLOSE, we picked up our New York Times and learned that the Bush administration has been fighting terrorism by intercepting communications in America without warrants. It was worrisome on its face, but in justifying their actions, officials have made a bad situation much worse: Administration lawyers and the president himself have tortured the Constitution and extracted a suspension of the separation of powers. . . .

Willful disregard of a law is potentially an impeachable offense. It is at least as impeachable as having a sexual escapade under the Oval Office desk and lying about it later. The members of the House Judiciary Committee who staged the impeachment of President Clinton ought to be as outraged at this situation. They ought to investigate it, consider it carefully and report either a bill that would change the wiretap laws to suit the president or a bill of impeachment.

It is important to be clear that an impeachment case, if it comes to that, would not be about wiretapping, or about a possible Constitutional right not to be wiretapped. It would be about the power of Congress to set wiretapping rules by law, and it is about the obligation of the president to follow the rules in the Acts that he and his predecessors signed into law.

American Family Association gets a clue!?!?

|

From today's Chronicle:


The American Family Association is suggesting that adults buy nothing from stores for each other next year. Sliding an Xbox 360 to a child would be OK, said association president Tim Wildmon, but adults should funnel their consumer cash to a charity that helps the poor -- preferably one friendly to "Christian values" such as the Salvation Army.

If grown-ups really want to express their appreciation for someone through a Christmas gift, Wildmon suggests that they either make something themselves or give a gift of their time. He wants folks to focus on Christmas as the birth of Jesus Christ, not as the day before the after-Christmas sales begin.

"We want people to get back to what Christmas should be about," Wildmon said.

Wow... I agree with them about something? How weird is that?

Not that their motives are entirely pure:

"Such an effort will remind all of us, including retailers, what Christmas is all about," the American Family Association chairman, Donald Wildmon, Tim Wildmon's father, wrote in an e-mail to supporters last week. "I very much believe that you will see retailers get on board promoting Christmas instead of Happy Holidays.

"If they miss us shopping next Christmas, maybe they will respect us more."

Of course, many of his colleagues are hemming and hawing and saying things like...

"I certainly understand Tim Wildmon's concern to focus on the true meaning of Christmas," said Mathew Staver, president of Liberty Counsel. The conservative legal organization's "Friend or Foe Christmas" campaign promised to file suit against anyone who spread what the group saw as misinformation about how Christmas can be celebrated in schools and public spaces.

"But I fail to see how that (not buying gifts) would bring back the essence of Christmas," Staver said. "And I don't think it would affect retailers. Besides, that's part of the joy of Christmas -- to give someone a gift to show your appreciation for them."

Jan LaRue, legal counsel with Concerned Women for America, another major conservative player in the Christmas campaign, said that while the idea of contributing to the needy was noble, "I don't know if it has to be linked to punishing retailers. A lot of believers, Christians and Jews, own small businesses that would be punished by the loss of income during the Christmas season."

Michael Lerner of Tikkun weighs in...

"Liberals and civil libertarians would be making a huge mistake to see this as merely the rantings of a few overt anti-Semites and anti-civil-liberties extremists. They articulate a legitimate concern that many Christians say privately: Their children have learned that Christmas is about buying -- and the person with the most expensive gifts wins!

"Our task is to help them understand that the solution is not blaming secular people, civil libertarians, Jews, gays or anyone else," Lerner wrote, "but instead to recognize that the emptiness or feeling of loneliness of 'lack' has been forced upon them by market values that they need to become aware of and then reject."

Don't hold your breath, Mr. Lerner.

Oakland Trib: "Send us your copies of 1984!"

|

Today's Oakland Tribune starts like this:

It took 21 years longer than expected, but the future has finally arrived.

And we don't like it. Not one bit.

We are fighting a war with no end to create a peace with no defined victory.

We occupy a foreign land that doesn't want us, while at home our civil liberties are discounted.

We are told that it's better not to know what our government is doing in our name, for security purposes. Meanwhile, our government is becoming omnipresent, spying on us whenever it deems it necessary.

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

George Orwell was right after all.

and ends like this:

We think it's time for Congress to heed the warning of George Orwell.

To that end, we're asking for your help: Mail us or drop off your tattered copies of "1984." When we get 537 of them, we'll send them to every member of the House of Representatives and Senate and to President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

Feel free to inscribe the book with a note, reminding these fine people that we Americans take the threat to our liberties seriously. Remind Congress that it makes no sense to fight a war for democracy in a foreign land while allowing our democratic principles to erode at home.

Remind President Bush that ours is a country of checks and balances, not unbridled power.

Perhaps our nation's leaders can find some truth in this fiction and more carefully ponder the road we're traveling.

Bring or mail your books to the Oakland Tribune, 401 13th St., Oakland CA 94612. Doors are open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Heh. This appeared this morning. I bet by now they've received more copies than they bargained for, and that copies keep turning up at their doorstep for years...

"Tainted Tzedakah:" When Jews go bad!

|

Tikkun Olam has a lengthy and great post about Abramoff, Milken, and the implications of taking donations from someone whose conduct and character leaves much to be desired. Worth a read.

My ipod has been tainted.

|

I'm disturbed beyond measure that Dick Cheney and I have something in common: our deep love of the iPod.

I'd just like to think I wouldn't be such a big dick about it if there weren't enough outlets on the plane.

Oh, and also, I'm sure my taste in music is MUCH better than his. Not that I know what's on his playlist; I'm sure that information is in a secret undisclosed location in a bunker somewhere.

Site move

|
I've just moved my website and email to a new server and reinstalled everything, which is why it looks so weird. Oh well, it was time for a design overhaul anyway — I'll be tweaking this generic-looking template over the next week. Or so.

Testing

|
Testing. Is this working?

...One propels itself to the top of the heap through sheer weirdness. Here is such a letter. Truly a masterpiece of awful (and just plain confusing) writing. And yet people are still fooled by these things...

Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:29:16 +0000
From: "Jim Smith" <jim_smith11@hotmail.co.uk>
jim_smith11@hotmail.co.uk 
Reply-to: mr_richard05@sify.com
Subject: CAN I TRUST YOU ON THIS ISSUE?    
 
From: Mr. Jim Smith.
26 Kesington Court,
London, England.

Dear Friend,

I am the above named person but now undergoing medical treatment in London, England. I worked with British Railway Commission in Chelsea England for over a decade in the year 2003.

I deposited the sum of £5 Million (Five Million Pounds sterling) in a Vault with a Security/Finance House in UK.Presently, this money is still with there. Recently, my Doctor told me that I would not last for the next 150 days due to cancer problem. Though what disturbs me most is my stroke.Having known my condition I decided to donate this fund to an individual or better still a God fearing person who will utilize this money the way I am going to instruct here in. I want an individual that will use this to fund and provide succor to poor and indigent persons, orphanages, and above all those affected in the Tsunami in far Asia.

I understand that blessed is the hand that giveth. I took this decision because I do not have any child that will inherit this money and my husband relatives are not inclined to helping poor persons. I do not want a situation where this money will be used in an ungodly manner, hence the reason for taking this bold decision. I am not afraid of death hence I know where I am going. I know that I am going to be in the bosom of the Almighty. I do not need any telephone communication in this regard because of my health, and because of the presence of my relatives around me always. I do not want them to know about this development. With God all things are possible.

As soon as I receive your reply I shall give you the contact of the Security/Finance House in UK. I will also issue them a letter of authority and change of ownership certificate that will empower you as the original beneficiary of this fund through my Lawyer. I want you to always pray for me. My happiness is that I lived a life worthy of emulation. Whosoever that wants to serve the Almighty must serve him with all his heart and mind and soul and also in truth.

Please always be prayerful all through your life. Any delay in your reply will give me room in sourcing for an individual for this same purpose.

Please assure me that you will act according to my specification herein.Hoping to hear from you as soon as possible.

Thank you and May the Almighty bless you.

Yours sincerely,
Mr. Jim Smith (Benefactor).

If you're not done with your gift shopping...

|

No insurance? No more life support for you!

|

This is such an awful story. (Can't see it? Log in using bugmenot.com)

A family has gathered to mourn a woman gone too soon.

Tirhas Habtegiris was an East African immigrant and only 27 when she died Monday afternoon.

She'd been on a respirator at Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano for 25 days.

"They handed me this letter on December 1st. and they said, we're going to give you 10 days so on the 11th day, we're going to pull it out," said her brother Daniel Salvi.

Salvi was stunned to get this hand-delivered notice invoking a complicated and rarely used Texas law where a doctor is "not obligated to continue" medical treatment "medically inappropriate" when care is not beneficial.

Even though her body was being ravaged by cancer, this family says Tirhas still responded and was conscious. She was waiting one person.

"She wanted to get her mom over here or to get to her mom so she could die in her mom's arms," says her cousin Meri Tesfay.

Ten days was not enough time, they say, to get a mother from Africa to America.

The family and hospital desperately tried to get Tirhas moved to a nursing home but they say no one would take her.

"A fund issue is what I understand. Because she is not insured and that was the major reason the way I understood it," Salvi said.

A statement from Baylor Plano disputes that and says the hospital did its best to comply with the family's wishes in every way.

Still, on the 11th day, Tirhas Habtegiris was taken off the respirator and died.

Her family feels caught in America's health insurance crisis.

"And it's kind of a shock to me too to experience this in this country. It's the richest country in the world. Very sad," Salvi said.

Experts say there are very few charity beds for ventilator dependent patients in this state. President George W. Bush has said he wants to expand healthcare for legal immigrants in this country.

 

The fearless defenders of Christmas...

|

Not only are they passionate and dedicated, they are fine journalists!

Putting Christ Back into Christmas

Not only in East Tennessee, but across the country, there's a debate raging over political correctness.  Many companies and businesses are bowing under pressure to remove the word Christmas and substitute, Happy Holidays instead.  Now there's a campaign underway to buck that trend rather loudly. 

WVLT Volunteer TV's Alan Williams has more.

  Keeping the word, Christ in Christmas is becoming more and more controversial. Churches all over America are rebelling against businesses being political correct during the holidays.  One Tampa church put up a controversial sign to vent their frustration.  In Lexington, North Carolina, a crusade is also on.  If businesses there take Christ out, they'll boycott.

"We ask our members don't shop where they won't honor what you believe," Charlotte pastor Bishop Phillip Davis said. 

The pastors accuse big retailers of leaving the phrase Merry Christmas out of advertising.  They say happy holidays just won't do.

"They want Christians' dollars to shop at Christmas, but they want to take Christ out," said Reverend Ron Baity from Lexington, North Carolina.

"Many of the survey's that we have looked over now says that 85 to 86 percent of the people inthe Tampa Bay area want to use the word Christmas," pastor Randy White said. 

Some people, even of the Jewish faith agree, there is nothing wrong with expressing the term, Merry Christmas.

"If Christ is at the base of someone else's religion, they should be free to say Merry Christmas without fear of retribution and being politically correct is not what it's all about.  It's being free to say whatever is in your heart," one woman of the Jewish faith said.

A commitee to save Christmas is underway in California, and the American Family Association in Mississippi are conducting internet write-in campaign urging store boycotts.  Walmart for example says it has no policy that prohibits Merry Christmas, but it's store theme is Home for the Holidays.  Home Depot says it includes the word Christmas and said, quote, "we also use the word holiday."  From town squares to the airwaves, it seems everyone has an opinion.

"I think it's nothing but right to say Merry Christmas and Happy New Year," Santa Claus said. 

As for the online petition one pastor started, he says he's received so much attention the church computer overloaded and shut down.

The misplaced punctuation, the poorly sourced quotes and surveys... Jesus Christ! 

That death penalty thing: a poorly worded rant

|

So Ahnold is still trying to decide whether to grant clemancy to Tookie Williams or not. Everyone has reasons for wanting to stop the execution: he's a good role model now; there's a danger of L.A. breaking out in riots if Tookie gets executed; etc. etc.

Me, I'm a little skeptical of the whole "Save Tookie!" phenomenon, just as when I read about people fawning over Mumia, I roll my eyes (by the way, he's apparently just got a bit of good news from the Third Circuit.)

People tend to identify with the individual case, I suppose. Environmental groups have more success when they turn the spotlight on the fate of some cute fuzzy animals, and death-row opponents sometimes seem to pick a particularly well-spoken, presentable person on death row to rally around. But what about the unlovely insects who are just as in danger of extinction, and what about the thousands (thousands?!) of others waiting for their sentences to be carried out?

Anyway, I hate that this case hinges on whether Williams has sufficiently repented and redeemed himself or not. How about, we just shouldn't be in the business of executing people, period? Capital punishment isn't making us safer, it's just another factor destroying our moral fabric (much more so then the "war on Christmas.")

With no death penalty, life-or-death decisions don't have to be made via popularity contest. Love Tookie or hate him, it doesn't matter. He's in prison and he's not getting out. End of story.

Admit it. Don't you get a twinge of satisfaction when you hear Charles Manson has been turned down for parole for the umpteenth time? You know that has got to suck. And so it should.

But in any case, it seems fewer people are being sentenced to death these days. Maybe someday we'll collectively come to our senses and get rid of the stupid death penalty for once and all. 

Bush is afraid of Bill Clinton.

|

Well, how else do you explain this ridiculous turn of events?

ush-administration officials privately threatened organizers of the U.N. Climate Change Conference, telling them that any chance there might’ve been for the United States to sign on to the Kyoto global-warming protocol would be scuttled if they allowed Bill Clinton to speak at the gathering today in Montreal, according to a source involved with the negotiations who spoke to New York Magazine on condition of anonymity.

Bush officials informed organizers of their intention to pull out of the new Kyoto deal late Thursday afternoon, soon after news leaked that Clinton was scheduled to speak, the source said.

The threat set in motion a flurry of frantic back-channel negotiations between conference organizers and aides to Bush and Clinton that lasted into the night on Thursday, and at one point Clinton flatly told his advisers that he was going to pull out and not deliver the speech, the source said.

“It’s just astounding,” the source told New York Magazine. “It came through loud and clear from the Bush people—they wouldn’t sign the deal if Clinton were allowed to speak.” Clinton spokesman Jay Carson confirmed the behind the dustup took place and that the former president had decided not to go out of fear of harming the negotiations, but Carson declined to comment further.

On Friday afternoon, Clinton did end up speaking at the conference, a global audience of diplomats, environmentalists, and others who were in the final hours of a two-week gathering devoted to discussing the future of the protocol, the existing emissions-controls agreement.

Um... WTF?

They Might Be Podcasting!

|

No, actually, they ARE podcasting! They Might Be Giants, that is. And it's cracking me up. Their version of "It Was a Very Good Year" is hysterically odd.

You out there with iTunes. Get cracking and download this thing, if you ever liked TMBG. Me, I thought I'd outgrown them, I could shake my tiny fist and say I wasn't wrong, but no.

They don't want the world, they just want your half. 

http://www.tmbg.com/pod.html 

This recipe is in the December issue of Sunset, and we made it last night. Very, very tasty and easy. (I substituted vegetable broth for chicken.)

2  tablespoons olive oil
1  onion (6 oz.), peeled and chopped
About 1 teaspoon salt
4  cloves garlic, peeled and minced
1/4-1/2  teaspoon hot chile flakes
2  carrots (6 to 8 oz. total), peeled and chopped
4  Roma tomatoes (12 oz. total), seeded and chopped
2  cans (15 oz. each) artichoke hearts, drained, rinsed, and quartered
1  can (15 oz.) garbanzos, drained and rinsed
2  cans (15 oz. each) reduced-sodium chicken broth
1  tablespoon chopped fresh sage
1  teaspoon lemon juice
Pepper

1. Set a 4- to 6-quart pan over medium-high heat. Add oil, onion, and 1 teaspoon salt. Stir often until onion becomes translucent, about 3 minutes. Add garlic and chile flakes. Stir until garlic softens, 1 to 2 minutes. Add carrots, tomatoes, artichoke hearts, garbanzos, and chicken broth. Bring to a boil, then reduce heat. Cover and simmer until carrots are tender when pierced, about 15 minutes.

2. Season with sage, lemon juice, salt, and pepper to taste. Ladle into bowls.

 

Column on the Christmas Wars

|

Good column in the New York Times today... 

Religious conservatives have a cause this holiday season: the commercialization of Christmas. They're for it.

The American Family Association is leading a boycott of Target for not using the words "Merry Christmas" in its advertising. (Target denies it has an anti-Merry-Christmas policy.) The Catholic League boycotted Wal-Mart in part over the way its Web site treated searches for "Christmas." Bill O'Reilly, the Fox anchor who last year started a "Christmas Under Siege" campaign, has a chart on his Web site of stores that use the phrase "Happy Holidays," along with a poll that asks, "Will you shop at stores that do not say 'Merry Christmas'?"

This campaign - which is being hyped on Fox and conservative talk radio - is an odd one. Christmas remains ubiquitous, and with its celebrators in control of the White House, Congress, the Supreme Court and every state supreme court and legislature, it hardly lacks for powerful supporters. There is also something perverse, when Christians are being jailed for discussing the Bible in Saudi Arabia and slaughtered in Sudan, about spending so much energy on stores that sell "holiday trees."

What is less obvious, though, is that Christmas's self-proclaimed defenders are rewriting the holiday's history. They claim that the "traditional" American Christmas is under attack by what John Gibson, another Fox anchor, calls "professional atheists" and "Christian haters." But America has a complicated history with Christmas, going back to the Puritans, who despised it. What the boycotters are doing is not defending America's Christmas traditions, but creating a new version of the holiday that fits a political agenda.

The Puritans considered Christmas un-Christian, and hoped to keep it out of America. They could not find Dec. 25 in the Bible, their sole source of religious guidance, and insisted that the date derived from Saturnalia, the Roman heathens' wintertime celebration. On their first Dec. 25 in the New World, in 1620, the Puritans worked on building projects and ostentatiously ignored the holiday. From 1659 to 1681 Massachusetts went further, making celebrating Christmas "by forbearing of labor, feasting or in any other way" a crime.

It's worth reading the whole thing.

I keep picturing Jerry Falwell and a small group of his holy goons walking into one of the box stores to strong-arm the store manager. As he turns to go, he says with a wink, "And while youse guys are at it, may I and my boys suggest that maybe an unfortunate accident should happen to the Chanukah decorations. 'The menorahs was tragically lost at sea on the way from the factory in China when the cargo container hit a storm... THE DREIDELS SLEEP WITH THE FISHES!'"

O.K., I'm sure that's not what Jerry Falwell actually does. Really. 

Updated to add: Apparently the following exchange - which could have been taken straight from the pages of the Onion - actually took place on Bill O'Rellly's show the other day:

Rev. Tim Bumgardner: I think they should put a Nativity scene -- be American! Hey, celebrate Christmas -- people spend more money! Jesus makes people want to spend money!

O'Reilly: I agree. I'm with you.

Yeah. 

Intelligent design not catching on?

|
"I teach at the largest Baptist university in the world. I'm a religious person. And my basic perspective is intelligent design doesn't belong in science class." Very interesting article in the New York Times.

From her Salon.com article on Madonna...

Madonna described her forthcoming CD as "future disco" -- which raised the hopes of all die-hard disco fans that "Confessions on a Dance Floor" would be a masterpiece, a return to roots but also a visionary breakthrough.

That's not what we got -- though you'd never know it from the gushing reviews, which applauded the CD for achieving Madonna's purported aim of making people dance. My blood boiled at this insulting reduction of dance music to gymnastics -- mere recreational aerobics. I for one do not dance to dance music; disco for me is a lofty metaphysical mode that induces contemplation. (Of course, this may partly descend from my Agnes Gooch marginalization in the old bar scene, where I was -- as Nora Ephron would say -- a wallflower at the orgy.) Giorgio Moroder's albums, which I listened to obsessively on headphones, were an enormous inspiration to me throughout the writing of "Sexual Personae" in the 1970s and '80s. Disco at its best is a neurological event, a shamanistic vehicle of space-time travel.

It's apparently quite difficult to shake one's groove thang when one has a long pointy stick jabbed firmly up it.

Music I Listen To

 

Link Roller

Powered by Movable Type 4.2-en

Photos

Obama Purple. Playing. In the garden. Sun's up. Kitties!

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from December 2005 listed from newest to oldest.

November 2005 is the previous archive.

January 2006 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.