How do you reason with nonsensical logic like this (from a letter to Andrew Sullivan):
"The morals I cared about? A president who meant what he said. A man who is faithful to his wife. A man who doesn't pander to Hollywood. A man who is not ashamed to say he prays and give credit to a higher power, who helps him. A man who doesn't try to please all the people all the time. A man who shares my deeply held belief about freedom and what a GREAT country America is, and someone who knew Saddam Hussein has murdered 400,000 innocent men, women and children. I did not care if there were weapons of mass destruction, Saddam himself was a weapon of mass destruction. We are better off today, with this man gone from power, who can argue that? Who are these people that say we should have not gone in there, I thought we should of done this YEARS ago."
So why the hell didn't you vote for Kerry, then? What business is it of yours what goes on between George and Laura, or John and Teresa? Have you been following them to their bedrooms to make sure they actually are faithful? Both men believe in G-d, by both their accounts. Osama also talks to G-d all the time. Do you still automatically think that's a good thing? You really believe that a man like Kerry would fight for his country on the battlefield and in public office because he doesn't believe in America? If you don't care about WMDs, don't you care that many people did, and that's why they supported the war? You think it's OK to mislead your countrymen, accidentally or not? Do you think it's OK to have a man in power (Rummy) who shook hands with Saddam while the latter was killing his citizens and those of Iran?
And my final question: what drugs are you on, you brainwashed woman!?!?
